Type.GetType implementation with help of XamlReader

The Type.GetType method is different in Silverlight than in the standard .NET runtime. In Silverlight we must provide the fully qualified assembly name to get a type from an assembly. Only built in controls such as Button, Grid, ListBox, etc. or types in the executing assembly are excluded from this rule. Fully qualified assembly name means you must provide the version, culture and public key token. That means that the following GetType usage works well, until the target assembly version changes from 1.0 to 1.1.

Type.GetType("MyComponent.MyType, MyAssembly, Version=, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=4bec85d7bec6698f")

And do we really want to have such Xaml or code behind files?

<local:MyCustomElement Grid.Row="2" Grid.Column="1"
   ItemType="MyComponent.MyType, MyAssembly, Version=, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=4bec85d7bec6698f" >


Iterate over Assembly Parts

One option to load a type just by its type-name and assembly-name is to iterate over all loaded assemblies. The method AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies() does not exist in Silverlight, but we can iterate over all assembly parts that are included in the deployment, e.g. all assemblies that are in the XAP file. I’ve found a blog post from Malcolm Jack in which he describes how to iterate over the parts to find a type by its name.

An this is how it works in brief: loop through each assembly part, getting the assembly, then use assembly.GetType to load the type.

This is the code this short explanation:

public static Type GetAssemblyType(string assemblyName, string className)
    StreamResourceInfo info = Application.GetResourceStream(new Uri(assemblyName, UriKind.Relative));
    Assembly assembly = new AssemblyPart().Load(info.Stream);
    Type type = assembly.GetType(className);
    return type;

public static Type GetAssemblyType(string className)
    Type type = null;
    foreach (AssemblyPart part in Deployment.Current.Parts)
        type = GetAssemblyType(part.Source, className);
        if (type != null)
    return type;


Unfortunately this solution has two drawbacks:

1. Dynamic loaded assemblies downloaded with help of a web client instance are not part of the deployment, e.g. the code cannot find types in those assemblies. You can add an additional part to the collection after each downloaded dll, but you do not have a guarantee this will be done.

AssemblyPart part = new AssemblyPart();
Assembly assm = part.Load(e.Result);


2. The second issue is when using application library caching to reduce the XAP size.


If this option is enabled, it will change the application manifest and the XAP no longer includes those assemblies which do support assembly caching. See Tim Heuer’s posts to get more detail how it works.

The cached assemblies are now declared as external parts as you can see in the manifest file (AppManifest.xml):

<Deployment ... >
    <ExtensionPart Source="System.Windows.Controls.Input.Toolkit.zip" />
    <ExtensionPart Source="System.Xml.Linq.zip" />
    <ExtensionPart Source="System.Windows.Controls.zip" />
    <ExtensionPart Source="System.Windows.Controls.Toolkit.zip" />


In the end when the application starts those external assemblies will still be downloaded before the main form is added to the visual tree.


Iterating over all external parts is not that easy as iterating over all assembly parts, because it needs to download the source again and this is an asynchron operation.


The Solution: Using the XamlReader

I’ve found a solution by using the XamlReader to resolve types during parsing a xaml string. Unfortunately there is no StringToTypeConverter in Silverlight and the Xaml parser uses some hard coded logic to resolve System.Type properties only for certain type like Style and ControlTemplate. However, we can use a Style or ControlTemplate class and use the TargetType property to retrieve the type information. And these lines of code show how it works:

// create xaml with a simply Style element and set the TargetType property with the provided type name
string xaml = "<Style xmlns='http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation' ";

// set the xaml namesapce if provided
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(xamlNamespace))
    xaml += string.Format("xmlns:tmp='{0}' TargetType='tmp:{1}' />", xamlNamespace, className);
    // Core controls such as Button, Grid, ListBox, etc do not need a namespace
    xaml += string.Format("TargetType='{0}' />", className);

// let the XamlParser load the type via the TargetType property 
Style style = XamlReader.Load(xaml) as Style;

if (style != null)
    Type targetType = style.TargetType;
    return targetType;


Xaml parsing is not the fastest way to get a type. Therefore I encapsulated the functionality into a small class which maintains a cache for types which are already parsed.

The class provides four different ways to get a type:

// for types in the executing assembly or types in the core-control 
// assembly such as Button, Grid, etc. Just provide the type name.

// The type name with its xaml namespace
TypeLoader.GetType("Grid", "clr-namespace:System.Windows.Controls;assembly=System.Windows");

// Type name, namespace and assembly name as separate parameters
TypeLoader.GetType("Grid", "System.Windows.Controls", "System.Windows");

// Or with the assembly qualified type name, without version, culture and public key token
TypeLoader.GetType("System.Windows.Controls.Grid, System.Windows");


Here are some other examples:

// *** toolkit controls ***
// returns null, because NumericUpDown is in toolkit and not in core control assembly
               "System.Windows.Controls", "System.Windows.Controls.Input.Toolkit");
TypeLoader.GetType("System.Windows.Controls.NumericUpDown, System.Windows.Controls.Input.Toolkit");

// *** main application ***
// returns null, because MainPage is not in core-control assembly
//Type mainPage1 = TypeLoader.GetType("MainPage"); 
TypeLoader.GetType("MainPage", "clr-namespace:TypeLoaderDemo;assembly=TypeLoaderDemo");
TypeLoader.GetType("MainPage", "TypeLoaderDemo", "TypeLoaderDemo");
TypeLoader.GetType("TypeLoaderDemo.MainPage, TypeLoaderDemo");

// *** 3rd party libs ***
TypeLoader.GetType("MyButton", "clr-namespace:TypeLoaderControlLib;assembly=TypeLoaderControlLib");
TypeLoader.GetType("MyButton", "TypeLoaderControlLib", "TypeLoaderControlLib");

Demo Project and Source Code


Here you can find the TypeLoader implementation or a full demo project including TypeLoader source, examples, assembly parts iteration and dynamic assembly loading.


Listening to DependencyProperty changes in Silverlight

The dependency property system is a pretty nice concept. Receiving notifications for dependency property changes on an existing object is a very common scenario in order to update my view model or the UI.

This is quite easy in WPF:

// get the property descriptor
DependencyPropertyDescriptor prop = 
         DependencyPropertyDescriptor.FromProperty(TextBox.TextProperty, myTextBox.GetType());
// add change handler
prop.AddValueChanged(myTextBox, (sender, args) =>


Unfortunately Silverlight has a limited set of meta-data functionality around the dependency property system, because the DependencyPropertyDescriptor does exist in Silverlight.

In order to get a workaround I found a solution in which I get notified with help of the binding system. I simple use a relay object which value property is bound to the source property I want to get notified. The relay object contains a public event which raises when the value changes.



I’ve put the implementation details into a DependencyPropertyChangedListener class to make it as simple as possible and similar to WPF. The lines below show how simple it is to create the listener and attaching the event.

private DependencyPropertyChangedListener listener;
public MainPage()

    listener = DependencyPropertyChangedListener.Create(this.myTextBox, "Text");
    listener.ValueChanged += listener_ValueChanged;

void listener_ValueChanged(object sender, DependencyPropertyValueChangedEventArgs e)
    Debug.WriteLine(e.OldValue + " " + e.NewValue);

private void btnSetValue_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
    this.myTextBox.Text = DateTime.Now.Ticks.ToString();

The listener provides the method Detach to release the binding.



Known Limitations

It is not possible to listen for dependency property values which are inherited like the FontSize, DataContext and FontFamily properties so far.


Source code


Here you can find a demo project with full source code.


Keywords: Registering to a Dependency Property Change Event Property OverrideMetadata PropertyDescriptor prop TypeDescriptor GetProperties Receive notifications for dependency properties


.NET Reflector – Working with different profiles for Silverlight and the Core Framework

.NET Reflector is a one of the 10 Must-Have utilities for .NET developers. If you need to work with more than one version of the .NET Framework, especially with Silverlight and the Core Framework (3.5 or 4.0) you will find you reconfiguring your Reflector every time you changing the platform. For me this is very annoying tasks for which I was looking for a solution.


Different config files

.NET Reflector stores it settings into a config structure which includes all assemblies from the left tree in the application.

Recently I noticed the ability to start .NET Reflector with command line arguments. One command line argument allows to specify a config file path:
"C:\Program Files\Reflector\Reflector.exe" /configuration:”Reflector.cfg”

Unfortunately there seems to be a bug in version When closing Reflector it reports the following error:


When changing the config-path to an absolute syntax then it works fine:
"C:\Program Files\Reflector\Reflector.exe" /configuration:”C:\Program Files\Reflector\Reflector.cfg”

Creating different profiles

First create different .NET Reflector shortcuts for each profile you want to have. In my case these are Silverlight, .NET 3.5 and .NET 4.0.


Edit every shortcut and add the /configuration argument to every shortcut with a different name as config file. The config file must not exists at this time.

My shortcuts are as following:

  • "C:\Program Files\Reflector\Reflector.exe" /configuration:"C:\Program Files\Reflector\DOTNET40.cfg"
  • "C:\Program Files\Reflector\Reflector.exe" /configuration:"C:\Program Files\Reflector\DOTNET35.cfg"
  • "C:\Program Files\Reflector\Reflector.exe" /configuration:"C:\Program Files\Reflector\Silverlight.cfg"


Now start each profile with its shortcut. .NET Reflector will not find a config and asks you which default assembly list you want to use. Select the version matching to your shortcut and repeat this for every shortcut you have created.



Existing Add-Ins

.NET Reflector has a clear and simple config file structure. Therefore you can easily copy and paste your favorite Add-Ins from one config file to another config file.



Improving startup

Working with Vista/Windows 7 makes it very easy to find programs via the start menu. To use the program search, just put a copy of your shortcuts into your start menu folder (or a subfolder in it).

C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\MyStartMenuLinks


Now you can type in “Reflector” into your start menu search box and you get a selection of different .NET Reflector profiles.


For me these profiles are very helpful during my daily coding life.

Tagged , ,

VS 2010 Unit Test Problem with DataSet and Remoting

We ran into problems when using Visual Studio 2010 Unit Tests targeting Framework 3.5.

We use Visual Studio 2010 for our development, but we still use .NET Framework 3.5, because our customers a not ready to run .NET 4.0 applications.

Problem description in detail

When trying to transfer a DataSet instance over .NET Remoting and the executing client is a unit test environment, then it fails with an exception: “AssemblyResolveException…System.Data not found…”

.NET Remoting uses the XmlSerializer to serialize and deserialize DataSets over Remoting boundaries.
The XmlSerializer itself generates a dynamic in-memory assembly for each root-type in the object graph it serializes. This assembly is used to serialize or deserialize the object graph. That means initially the XmlSerializer creates a dynamic assembly with a reference to System.Data, because Visual Studio 2010 executes its Unit Tests with the runtime 4.0.

On server side .NET Remoting is trying to deserialize the DataSet of Version (because of the System.Data reference on client side). The deserialization process fails, because the server is running with Framework version 3.5.
Unfortunately VS2010 does not allow setting another Framework version for unit test projects, only version 4.0 is supported (http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/483939/unable-to-change-target-framework-version-on-unit-test-projects).

Possible solutions so far

  1. Migrate client and server to .NET 4.0
  2. Run unit tests with VS 2008
  3. Implement the AssemblyResolve event on server side and redirect to the System.Data
  4. Add an assemblyBinding element to the server’s config file to redirect System.Data to System.Data
  5. Waiting for a new Visual Studio Version which supports different target frameworks for unit test projects.

Our solution

We use the assemblyBinding element to redirect the System.Data assembly request to System.Data If we put the following config section into our application server app.config then we are able to use VS2010 for our Unit Tests targeting Framework 3.5.

   <assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1">
          <assemblyIdentity name="System.Data" publicKeyToken="b77a5c561934e089"/>
          <bindingRedirect oldVersion="" newVersion=""/>



Tagged ,

Optimize Data Contracts for better WCF Performance

Out of the box Silverlight provides two message encoding types for sending SOAP messages over the wire. These are TextEncoding and BinaryEncoding. MTOM encoding is still not available within Silverlight.

Binary encoded messages produce a payload that is about half the size of a message encoded with standard text encoding. Please note that binary encoding is a Microsoft proprietary implementation and therefore not interoperable outside the .NET framework.

In our Silverlight applications we use a .NET to .NET messaging scenario (like many other SL apps too), which means Silverlight communicates with a WCF backend. Using then binary encoded messages is obvious.
You will find a lot of blog posts out there in the community when you are interested in binary vs. text-encoding comparison.

What exactly does BinaryEncoding?

When the encoding is set to binary, then the DataContractSerializer still produces SOAP messages as XML but after that the messages get transformed into a binary representation of the XML with help of the XmlDictionaryWriter class.

The following code snippet shows the usage of the XmlDictionaryWriter class (not WCF related).


You should not compare the XmlDictionaryWriter with the well-known BinaryFormatter in the mscorlib. The BinaryFormatter produces a binary representation of an object graph. The XmlDictionaryWriter on the other hand translates a textual XML into a binary representation. Serializing a XML string with the BinaryFormatter will not reduce the size, because the XML is just a single string from this point of view.

The textual output form the example above indicates that it is a kind of an optimized XML structure.


Optimize Data Contracts

Binary XML still includes the names of the elements and attributes as plain text.

When setting the name of my data contracts to a single character then the SOAP message size will be reduced by additional 30-50 percent (depends on the data structure).



The SOAP-Envelop then look like this:


Rules for setting the name:

  • Each data contract must have a unique name in the scope of its namespace
  • Each data member must have a unique name in the scope of its class.
  • Use character [A-Za-z], you can mix upper and lower case.

After these changes the generated proxy on client side is quite unhandy, because the classes and members are named like they are declared in the contracts. Therefore I created a shared lib and reuse the data contracts on client side.


Assemblies built in Silverlight are in general not binary compatible with the .NET Framework, so if you want to share code you need to dual-compile your code. Since Silverlight 4 you will be able to use some Silverlight-based assemblies from within .NET 4. In order to load a Silverlight assembly in .NET, the assembly may only reference the following assemblies: mscorlib.dll, System, System.Core.dll, System.ComponentModel.Composition.dll, Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll.

Well, my shared data contracts dll needs a reference to System.Runtime.Serialization.dll which is currently not binary compatible with the Silverlight runtime.

Therefore I do a dual-compile by adding the same source file with “Add As Link” to my Silverlight library.


As final task I add a reference to SharedDataContract.SL assembly and update my service reference. Please check that the option “Reuse types in referenced assemblies” is checked.



Comparison of different configurations

Text encoding / standard contract



Text encoding / optimized contracts



Binary encoding / standard contracts



Binary encoding / optimized contracts



When communicating in a .NET to .NET messaging scenario then optimizing the data contracts is an additional way to reduce the SOAP message size. This together with binary encoding will reduce the message size about 4 times. Especially looking to the Windows Phone 7 development this will help when the traffic goes over a low bandwidth network.


Demo Project

Download it here

Tagged ,

Opening a Microsoft Office documents with Silverlight


From our Silverlight application we must be able to view documents. Documents are stored in an existing document management system and are accessible through a WCF REST service. It sounds very easy, but it was quite hard to understand all the stuff going on behind the Internet Explorer and the Microsoft Office.

Simplest solution

Download the content via a WebClient instance and save it with help of the Silverlight SaveFileDialog to the users local disk. Unfortunately this simple solution provides not the expected user experience, because Silverlight is not able to set the file name for the SaveFileDialog and after saving the user must manually navigate to the local folder and open the document by hand. The user experience should like be “Click & View” and not “Click, Safe, Search, Open & View”.

Expected solution

Open a popup from the Silverlight application with the URL pointing to the document.

Via HtmlPage:

Uri docUri = new Uri("http://mydomain/docs/test.docx");
HtmlPage.PopupWindow(docUri, "windwow1", null);

Or via a HyperlinkButton:

<HyperlinkButton Content="open document"
                TargetName="_blank" />

The service part

We deliver documents through a simple WCF REST service from our middle layer infrastructure. We use a custom authentication system that relies on HTTP session cookies for client identification. When the user isn’t authenticated then the service will redirect the request to the logon page (status code 302). The REST service is a self-hosted windows service (existing middle layer). The service is available with the URI pattern: http://<myhost>/docs/<docname&gt;

As example: http://mydomain/docs/test.docx

Here the simplified version of our REST service.

public Stream GetContent(string docId)

    WebOperationContext context = WebOperationContext.Current;

    // read session cookie
    string cookies = context.IncomingRequest.Headers[HttpRequestHeader.Cookie];
    string sessionId = "";
    if (cookies != null)
        // parse cookie values
        var cookieItems = from c in cookies.Split(';')
                            let cc = c.Split('=')
                            where cc.Length == 2
                            select new { Name = cc[0].Trim().ToLower(), Value = cc[1].Trim() };

        var items = cookieItems.ToDictionary(c => c.Name);

        if (items.ContainsKey("sessionid"))
            sessionId = items["sessionid"].Value;

    // check session is valid
    bool sessionValid = false;
    sessionValid = sessionId == "1234"; // todo

    if (!sessionValid)
        // redirect uri
        string redirectUri = "http://mydomain/logon.html";
        // ...set the location the logon site should naviagate to after the successful logon
        redirectUri += "?redirect=" + context.IncomingRequest.UriTemplateMatch.RequestUri.ToString();
        // redirect to the logon page 
        context.OutgoingResponse.Location = redirectUri;
        context.OutgoingResponse.StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.Redirect;
        // response has header only
        return null;


            // check if document exists 
            bool docExists = true; // todo

            if (docExists)
                // todo
                FileInfo requestedFile = new FileInfo("todo");

                // set mime type (firefox, chrome and safari requires them)
                context.OutgoingResponse.ContentType = GetMimeType(requestedFile.Extension);
                return new FileStream(requestedFile.FullName, FileMode.Open);
                // doc not found
                context.OutgoingResponse.StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.NotFound;
                context.OutgoingResponse.StatusDescription = "Document not found";
                // response has header only
                return null;

        catch (Exception ex)
            // general error
            context.OutgoingResponse.StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError;
            // response has header only
            return null;

At this point everything works fine with Firefox, Google Chrome and Safari on Mac.

Internet Explorer is different

Internet Explorer acts a little bit different as expected. When opening an office document (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) from a web page in Internet Explorer the Fiddler call stack lock like this:

winword:  HEAD    http://mydomain/docs/test.docx HTTP/1.1     405 NotAllowed
winword:  OPTIONS http://mydomain/docs/ HTTP/1.1              405 NotAllowed
winword:  GET     http://mydomain/docs/test.docx HTTP/1.1     302 Redirect

As you can see the iexplore process isn’t involved. What’s going on? IE detects the mime type from the file name extension, if it is preserved in the URL string. Here some examples:

http://mydomain/docs/test.docx IE detects mime type as docx
http://mydomain/service.svc/test.docx IE cannot detect mime type (it isn’t svc)
http://mydomain/resource.ashx?file=test.docx IE cannot detect mime type (it isn’t ash)

What happened with iexplore? Office 2007 and 2010 Beta are designed to make a more collaborative workspace. Therefore, several changes have been made to how Office works with web content. These changes provide better authoring features for the following Web servers that support Office:

  • Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services
  • Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server
  • Microsoft Exchange Web Store

IE detects if the web resource is an Office format by analyzing the URL. If so IE will start the corresponding Office program with the URL as process start parameter like the following:

“C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\WINWORD.EXE” /n http://mydomain/docs/test.docx”

Office is now downloading the content from the web:


The request will end with the status code 302 and a redirect location to our logon page, because session cookies are not shared between Internet Explorer and winword process. Well, Office Word will follow this redirection and tries to display our Silverlight logon page. This isn’t possible because the SL plug-in isn’t available for the Office suite and Word shows the following content.


When we change our service so that it doesn’t make a redirection and returning the status code 404 (Not Found), then word is telling me that it wasn’t able to open the doc.


First improvement

Changing the service to get another URL pattern for our documents so that IE cannot detect the mime type through the URL.

Something like this.

What’s happening now. Let’s look at Fiddler’s call stack.

iexplore: GET     http://mydomain/docs/test.docx HTTP/1.1     200 OK
winword:  HEAD    http://mydomain/docs/test.docx HTTP/1.1     405 NotAllowed
winword:  OPTIONS http://mydomain/docs/ HTTP/1.1              405 NotAllowed
winword:  GET     http://mydomain/docs/test.docx HTTP/1.1     302 Redirect

Now IE is downloading the content as expected. But then winword comes into the play again. What’s going on in this situation?

IE cannot detect the mime type from the URL so it will download the web content as any other browser. With the request to our service the browser is sending our session cookie to the server too. Based on the mime type from the response IE decides to open Microsoft Word. IE does that the same way as before: starting the winword process with a startup argument including the URL instead of the downloaded local file.

“C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\WINWORD.EXE” /n http://mydomain/docs/test.docx”

Same situation, Office looks like this again:


Why the Office suite is doing that? Because Office lets you edit and author documents on a Web site if the server supports Web authoring and collaboration (Sharepoint, Exchange, etc). First, Office tries to communicate with the Web server with a series of HEAD and OPTIONS requests to discover the possibilities of the webserver (“Microsoft Office Protocol Discovery”, “Microsoft Office Existence Discovery” and “Microsoft Office Core Storage Infrastructure”). Then Office tries to directly bind to the resource with a GET request to the web resource.

Second improvement

Our WCF REST service doesn’t handle the HEAD and OPTIONS request from the “Microsoft Office Protocol Discovery” and “Microsoft Office Existence Discovery”, but it redirects the GET request from the “Microsoft Office Core Storage Infrastructure” to the logon page while winword can’t deliver the session cookie.

What we can do is to detect the caller via the User-Agent header. There are three main User-Agent’s used from the Office suite.

  • Microsoft Office Protocol Discovery
  • Microsoft Office Core Storage Infrastructure
  • Microsoft Office Existence Discovery

In case of one of these 3 user-agents our service returns the status code 401 (Unauthorized) instead of the 302 (Redirect).

Then winword ignores the 401 and opens the document from the cached document which was previously downloaded from IE.

Here the code snippet to do that:

// check user agent for office product suite
bool isOfficeSuite = false;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(WebOperationContext.Current.IncomingRequest.UserAgent))
    string[] officeUserAgents = { "Microsoft Office Protocol Discovery",
                                    "Microsoft Office Existence Discovery",
                                    "Microsoft Office Core Storage Infrastructure" };

    string requestUserAgent = WebOperationContext.Current.IncomingRequest.UserAgent.ToLower();

    var q = from userAgent in officeUserAgents
            where requestUserAgent.ToLower().Replace(" ", "")
                               .Contains(userAgent.ToLower().Replace(" ", ""))
            select userAgent;

    isOfficeSuite = q.Count() > 0;

if (isOfficeSuite)
    // don't redirect when office program want getting the document via 
    // "Microsoft Office Protocol Discovery" or 
    // "Microsoft Office Core Storage Infrastructure" requests.
    // Excel/word whould redirect to the logon page an display the html!
    WebOperationContext.Current.OutgoingResponse.StatusCode = System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized;
    // redirect to the logon page
    WebOperationContext.Current.OutgoingResponse.StatusCode = System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Redirect;
    // TODO
    WebOperationContext.Current.OutgoingResponse.Location = "http://rnd.glauxsoft.ch/evidencenovaweb/";

// response has header only
return null;


Unfortunately this works well with Office 2007, but first tests with Office 2010 Beta are different again. Excel and PowerPoint 2010 doesn’t ignore the 401 status code and telling us “Could not open the document …”. Maybe this is an error in the beta.

Third improvement

However, this kind of communication doesn’t make me happy. What can we do that IE downloads the content and then simply start the process associated to the mime type as that other browsers still do?

The typical workaround I found is to use the Content-Disposition attachment header in the GET response when returning the file. This header will tell the web browser to treat the file as a download (read-only), so the file will open in Office from the web browser cache location instead of a URL. With that setting, the Office application will treat the file as local, and will therefore not make calls back to the web server.

Content-disposition is an extension to the MIME protocol that instructs a MIME user agent on how it should display an attached file. When Internet Explorer receives the header, it raises a File Download dialog box whose file name box is automatically populated with the file name that is specified in the header

In our service we set this header for all well-known Office formats, because other mime types should still be opened inline within the browser such as PDF, TXT or JPG, GIF, etc.

Here the code snippet to doing that

// well-know office formats
string[] officeMimeTypes =  {  ".doc",".dot",".docx",".dotx",".docm",".dotm",

// add content-disposition header.This header will tell the web browser 
// to treat the file as a download (read-only), so the file will open 
// in Office from the web browser cache location instead of a URL. 
if (officeMimeTypes.Contains(requestedFile.Extension.ToLower()))
                                            "attachment;filename=" + requestedFile.Name);

// set mime type (firefox, chrome and safari requires them always)
WebOperationContext.Current.OutgoingResponse.ContentType = GetMimeType(requestedFile.Extension);
return new FileStream(requestedFile.FullName, FileMode.Open);



Internet Explorer handles Microsoft Office formats other than expected. The main reason is to make a more collaborative workspace when working with SharePoint and Exchange. This different behavior let you run into troubles when you have your own service providing the documents.

In brief you should consider the following to get around these troubles:

  • Don’t let the IE detect the mime type from the URL
  • Don’t redirect to the logon page when the User-Agent is “Microsoft Office Core Storage Infrastructure”
  • Set the Content-disposition header for all well-known Office formats when returning the file.





Tagged , ,

evidence nova running on Windows Phone 7 Series

Panoramic applications are a part of the core Windows Phone 7 CTP experience. We already have a large web application built with Silverlight 3. The fact that Windows Phone 7 supports Silverlight as its application platform gave me the inspiration to think about a version which is running on the Windows Phone 7 as a panoramic applications. I created a small demo application to demonstrate how our platform “evidence nova” could look like when running on the Windows Phone 7.

Click here to run the showcase application (after the application is started, click into the content to navigate through the application).


Tagged , ,

MCTS Exam .NET Framework Application Development

Today I have passed my second Microsoft Certification Exam 70-536 "Microsoft .NET Application Development" successfully. After working about 6 year with the .NET technology it was quite an easy tasks to pass this exam.



Deep Zoom Collection Downloader

Just for fun I’ve implemented a Deep Zoom Tiles Downloader which recreates the original image from a deep zoom composition. Additionally the downloader can download the original composition from the website to your local disk. The downloader follows the principals of a pure MVVM application.

No, i have not too much time. I’m pretty well experienced with the MVVM pattern in Silverlight but not in the WPF runtime. To get more familiar with MVVM in WPF and to see the difference in a practical manner I decided to put the implementation into a ViewModel and to build a WPF-View on top of them.

The Application

In the Image Rebuilder tab, the application allows to set the deep zoom image settings or discover them automatically from a standard Deep Zoom Composer xml-file.


The downloader allows you to set each deep zoom composition parameter manually, because there are deep zoom compositions out there in the internet without having the standard Deep Zoom Composer XML format.

One nice example of such a collection is the “Matterhorn Deep Zoom Collection” created by Ronnie Saurenmann (Microsoft Switzerland).


Enter the following values to test the downloader with his collection:


In the Tiles Downloader tab, the application allows to set the root folder of the deep zoom composition (containing the folder levels 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc), specifying the download target folder and to start the download.



ViewModel implementation

I’m using the Bitmap from the GDI to rebuild the image. A 32 bit RGB formatted bitmap uses 32 bit i.e. 4 bytes to store data for each pixel. So if you try to rebuild a large deep zoom composition with as example of 50000×50000 pixels then the memory the downloader needs to allocate dynamically for the image is very large 50000*50000*4 bytes which is roughly about 9 GB in memory. While this is not possible with GDI the downloader downloads the image in smaller portion so you might get an image portioned as following (example show image in 5 portions):


It should be very easy to build the final image with Photoshop or ImageMagick from the portioned tiles. Feel free to extend the downloader with a better approach while using a 3rd party image lib.

A note about the performance: the downloader rebuilds or downloads images tile-by-tile. I did not have enough time to do it parallel in several threads.


It’s quite the same to implement a ViewModel in WPF and Silverlight for such very small applications. The only difference I can see so far is the missing constraint for asynchron web request in WPF. This makes the implementation a little bit simpler. The binding expressions are identically to Silverlight, because I don’t need any special here. The command binding was easier to write because the Command property is supported from the ButtonBase natively (Silverlight will provide the same in version 4).

I know, this is a quite simple application and things get complicated when the application gets more complex.

Feedbacks are welcome.

Source code

You can download the source code here:


One final note

This downloader was implemented just for fun. Please consider copyrights when downloading deep zoom images.

Tagged , , ,

The Future of Business Applications

Today the Netzwoche magazine has published a Silverlight/RIA story in cooperation with Microsoft Switzerland. The title of the story is “The Future of Business Applications”. The story contains an interview which I was allowed to give (in German only).



Tagged ,